Legal Opinion
Gray v. Tice
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 17, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
52 N.J. Super. 309 (1958)
145 A.2d 353
JOHN C. GRAY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WILLIAM TICE AND RAYMOND T. DYGERT, DEFENDANTS, AND MARVIN STILL, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF MARLENE J. STILL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
RAYMOND DYGERT AND WILLIAM TICE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 17, 1958.
Mr. Vincent T. Dee, attorney for plaintiff John C. Gray.
Mr. Herbert J. Kenarik, attorney for plaintiff Marvin Still, administrator ad prosequendum of Marlene J. Still.
Mr. Thomas J. Holleran, attorney for defendant Raymond Dygert.
Mr. Joseph P. Dallanegra, attorney for the Unsatisfied Claim and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Wright v. VogtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steele v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Holmberg v. AtenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- William Dodd v. George R. CopelandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Tinsman v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Gilbert v. Unsatisfied Claim, Etc., Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.