Legal Opinion
Holmberg v. Aten
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 2, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 N.J. Super. 73 (1961)
171 A.2d 667
CATHERINE HOLMBERG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN ATEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 15, 1961.
Decided June 2, 1961.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.
Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Spernow & Geaney, attorneys).
Mr. Frederick J. Wortmann argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Braff, Litvak & Ertag, attorneys; Mr. Wortmann, of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. Theodore I. Botter, Assistant Attorney General, filed a statement in lieu of brief (Mr. David D.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Harvey v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Robson v. RodriquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- New Jersey Restaurant Ass'n v. HoldermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garcia v. SnedekerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- William Dodd v. George R. CopelandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Wyche v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM FUNDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Feliciano v. OglesbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Cheatham v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judg. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.