Legal Opinion

William Dodd v. George R. Copeland

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 7, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

99 N.J. Super. 481 (1968)

240 A.2d 444

WILLIAM DODD, EDWARD DODD AND MARION ELIZABETH DODD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

GEORGE R. COPELAND, GEORGE D. COPELAND, AND SAMUEL J. COX, DEFENDANTS, SAMUEL J. COX AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND, APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 5, 1968.

Decided March 7, 1968.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

Mr. Bruce D. Herrigel argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Herrigel & Herrigel, attorneys).

Mr. John J. Trombadore argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Trombadore & Trombadore, attorneys).

The opinion of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Theobald v. AngelosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Richard v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Van Houten v. NJ Manufacturers Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Dodd v. COPELANDSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API