Legal Opinion
Tinsman v. Parsekian
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 23, 1961PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
65 N.J. Super. 217 (1961)
167 A.2d 407
CHARLES TINSMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NED PARSEKIAN, ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND SAFETY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 9, 1961.
Decided January 23, 1961.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.
Mr. Jack Pincus argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Pincus, Shamy & Sheehan, attorneys; Mr. George J. Shamy, of counsel).
Mr. John C. Stockel argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.
P…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Corrigan v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Tischler v. SteinholtzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Giacobbe v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Gray v. TiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. One (1) Ford Van EconolineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- American Hdwe. Mutual Ins. Co. v. Mullers.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Continos v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Dobrolowski v. RC Chevrolet, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Dietz v. MeyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.