Legal Opinion

Steele v. Wilson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1971No. Docket 6686PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

The sole issue raised by plaintiffs on appeal is as follows:

Where plaintiffs have negotiated settlements with some of the tortfeasors involved in an automobile accident and have subsequently commenced suit against the sole remaining uninsured tortfeasor, are plaintiffs barred by the provisions of § 7(3) of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act from proceeding against the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund 1 for payment of any judgment against the uninsured tortfeasor?

The facts in this case are undisputed. On September 26, 1967, plaintiffs were passengers in a Checker Cab, owned by Paul…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moyses v. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Holland v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Larabell v. SchuknechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Swift v. DodsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. In re the Assignment of George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Payless Stations, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Watts v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dillon v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Brunner v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Lisee v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API