Legal Opinion

Carey v. Glenco Citrus Products

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1965No. Civ. 7398PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

— The plaintiffs were the owners of adjoining 10-aere orange groves and brought this action to quiet their title thereto against claims of the defendants Tietz Construction Company, a corporation, Capitol Estates No. 1, Inc., a corporation, World Market Properties No. 2, Inc., a corporation, and Glenco Citrus Products Co., a partnership, hereinafter respectively referred to as Construction Company, Capitol Estates, World Properties and Glenco. The defendant Glenco answered and cross-complained, alleging the purchase of an orange crop growing on the subject property and its subsequent…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Arstein v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thiara v. Spycher Bros. (In Re Thiara)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Orme v. State ex rel. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Sloan v. HiattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API