Legal Opinion
Orme v. State ex rel. Department of Water Resources
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1978No. Civ. No. 16581PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, J.
Plaintiffs, John K. Orme and Edith B. Orme, appeal from that portion of an inverse condemnation judgment which awarded them approximately $67,700 damages and denied interest on the entire award from the date the first damage occurred, and from the order granting the motion of the state, taxing engineering costs and attorney fees.
Statement of Facts
The plaintiffs appeal only from post trial decisions of the court rendered after a jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor. The following factual summary is not disputed and has been gleaned from the recitation of facts contained…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- French v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Tilem v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.