Legal Opinion

Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1968No. Civ. 11952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Petitioner Stauffer Chemical Company is a defendant in nine separate suits seeking damages allegedly caused by an agricultural weed killer. Although all the plaintiffs farmed in Modoc County, they filed the suits in Siskiyou County where a codefendant resided. Stauffer moved to change venue to Modoc County. In four of the suits the plaintiffs were landowners, alleging damage to their soil as well as to their growing crops. These four suits were transferred to Modoc County as actions for injury to real property. (Code Civ. Proc. § 392.) The other five actions were brought by lessees, alleging…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Standard Brands of California v. BryceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amparano v. Asarco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. American Advertising Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Foundation Engineers, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. American Advertising Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Amparano v. AsarcoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API