Legal Opinion
Doyle v. NAI PERSONNEL, INC.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 2010No. 08-AA-1250, 08-AA-1251PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Senior Judge:
These petitions for review present once again the issue of whether a claim for unemployment compensation was properly denied on the ground that the claimant had lost her job because of action constituting “gross misconduct.” See D.C.Code § 51 — 110(b)(1) (2001); 7 DCMR § 312.3. 1 Primarily in light of our decision in Odeni-ran, supra note 1, we reverse the determination of gross misconduct by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in this case and remand for consideration of an unresolved issue of whether petitioner “abandoned” or voluntarily left her job rather than having…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Odeniran v. Hanley Wood, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Morris v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Chase v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Larry v. National Rehabilitation HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Badawi v. Hawk One Security, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bowman-Cook v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Scott v. Behavioral Research Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Benjamin v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gilmore v. ATLANTIC SERVICES GROUPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.