Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clough v. Baber

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1940No. Civ. 6309PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel an irrigation district to pay certain matured and registered bonds and interest-bearing coupons from the limited funds on hand. The chief opposition to the payment of the bonds and coupons is that the district is insolvent and therefore unable to meet its obligations. It is asserted the payment of those bonds and coupons will constitute an unjust preference since the lands in the district have all been sold for delinquent assessments; that the power of the district to meet its indebtedness by assessments or otherwise has been completely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Provident Land Corp. v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Rohwer v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West Coast Life Ins. Co. v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. California Ass'n for Health Service at Home v. State Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Ault v. Council of City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. El Camino Land Corp. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API