Legal Opinion
Ault v. Council of City of San Rafael
California Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1941No. S. F. 16544PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Petitioner, as a registered elector of the City of San Rafael, filed his application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to publish a proposed amendment to the charter of said city, and to call a special election thereon not less than forty nor more than sixty days *416thereafter. An alternative writ of mandate has been heretofore issued; a return filed by respondents; and the cause argued orally by counsel for the respective parties.
It is alleged that a petition requesting the city council to submit to the electors of the city a proposed amendment to the city charter was circulated and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- DeBrincat v. MoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Fawkes v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Clough v. BaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by21 opinions
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Eduardo P. TRUJILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Concerned Citizens of Palm Desert, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Grant v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.