Legal Opinion

El Camino Land Corp. v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1941No. Civ. 6535PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle,j.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying to petitioner and appellant herein a writ of mandamus.

Petitioner is the owner of $275,000 par value out of a total of $423,000 par value of bonds issued by El Camino Irrigation District. It seeks by mandamus to compel respondent Board of Supervisors of Tehama County, California, to cause to be prepared an assessment roll of all assessable lands within said district situated within said county, and to levy an assessment thereon in an amount sufficient to pay and retire all matured bonds and coupons of said district then outstanding, as provided by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Clough v. BaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Allen v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pueblo Trading Co. v. El Camino Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Allen v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Kennelly v. LoweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API