Legal Opinion
Rohwer v. Gibson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 1932No. Docket No. 4764PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The petitioner in this action is the owner and holder of 1395 of the outstanding bonds of Reclamation District No. 2057, of the aggregate value of $1,395,000. All of said bonds are dated July 1, 1924, and are of the face value of $1,000 each, bearing interest at the rate of six per cent per annum, payable semi-annually. On July 1, 1932, there became due on each bond the sum of $30, as evidenced by the coupons attached thereto; that on the first day of July, 1932, there became due on the bonds held by your petitioner the sum of $41,850, being the amount of the interest coupons falling due on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Austin v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Galena v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Sutter Basin Corp. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.