Legal Opinion

Steinour v. Oakley State Bank

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1928No. 4297PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, C. J.

Appellants owed one Edwards $1,500, payment of which was secured by a mortgage on the land involved in this action. On a failure to pay the debt the land was sold under mortgage foreclosure to one Hazel, who assigned the sheriff’s certificate of sale to respondent. The period of redemption from the foreclosure sale expired on December 13, 1912. On December 14th, appellants offered to redeem from the foreclosure. Respondent refused the tender because it did not also include a debt secured by a subsequent mortgage on the same land. Two or three days thereafter such additional sum was tendered…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Whitney v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Harris v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fischer v. FischerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Brown v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Stickel v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API