Simpson v. Castle
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, County of San Joaquin. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Counsel for appellant relied on the following cases: 8 Johns. 333; 4 Cow. 133; 5 Hill. 228; 2 Hilliard on Mortgages, 108.
Counsel for respondent cited Macovich v. Wemppel, 16 Cal. 105; Page v. Rogers, 31 Cal. 293, to the point that the land was the property of Post until redeemed; and that the judgment, when docketed, became a lien. (Chapin v. Broder, 16 Cal. 422; Hunt v. Dohrs, 39 Cal. 304; Hibbard v. Smith, 50 Cal. 511.)
By the Court, Crockett, J.:
One Post, being the owner of certain lands, made a mortgage thereon to the defendant Castle, to secure the payment of a debt due from the former to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Chapin & Mastick v. BroderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hewson v. DeygertNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Hervey v. KrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Horn v. Indianapolis National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- McQueeney v. ToomeyMontana Supreme Court · 1907
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.