Duff v. Randall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County and from an order denying a nevi' trial. E. W. Wilson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Ejectment for certain lands in the county of Humboldt.
The title to the property in question was vested in William R. Duff in 1863, and upon his death, in 1875, the plaintiffs herein succeeded to his interest in the property as his heirs at law. In 1869 he, by his attorney, conveyed the property to Robert P. Duff, who mortgaged it to Huntoon July 19, 1877. In an action by these plaintiffs against Robert P. Duff (the facts of which are found in Duff v. Duff, 71 Cal. 513), it was determined that by reason of the fraud of the attorney, this conveyance did not have the effect to divest William R.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McMurtrie v. RiddellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Reynolds v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Cady v. PurserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bateman v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Leet v. ArmbrusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.