Uhl v. Badaracco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The following opinion, prepared by Mr. Presiding Justice Tyler, when sitting pro tempore for Mr. Justice Lennon, is adopted as the opinion and decision of the court:
Petition for mandate to compel the respondents to appropriate and use certain receipts obtained from the operation of the hydro-electric power plants of the Hetch Hetchy project to meet the interest and sinking fund payments on the outstanding bonds of such project and to compel respondents in levying and fixing the tax rate for 1926-1927 to include a tax therein of such amount only as represents the difference between…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. StevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Barker Bros., Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.