Legal Opinion
Goldfarb v. Town of West Hartford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 1, 2007No. 3:93-r-00014PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Iris Goldfarb (“Goldfarb”) brings this action against the Town of West Hartford (“the Town”), James Stril-lacci (“Strillacci”), Carl Rosensweig (“Ro-sensweig”), J.A. Garewski (“Garewski”), Joseph LaSata (“LaSata”) and Stephen B. Estes (“Estes”) (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of her rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and pursuant to Connecticut common law, claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress. Now pending are two motions for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Christian v. Town of RigaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Gentile v. NultyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Eiden v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Carone v. MascoloDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Murphy v. BeavEx, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.