Legal Opinion

Fanning v. Davne

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2002PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion By Joyce, J.

¶ 1 Sanford Davne, M.D. (Appellant), appeals from the July 13, 1999 orders that denied his motions for post-trial relief and granted Daniel Fanning’s (Appellee) petition for delay damages following a jury verdict in favor of Appellee. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows.

¶2 On October 7, 1987, Appellee, who was working as an electrician for Carr Electric, injured his back while standing on a scaffold that moved suddenly. Ap-pellee sought medical treatment and underwent spinal decompression and fusion surgeries in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Eichman v. McKeonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Greenfield v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  4. Grossi v. Travelers Personal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. U.S. Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. Bank of America, N.A. v. PautenisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API