Legal Opinion

Eichman v. McKeon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 2003PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrie Melvin, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal by Karen Eichman, Gregory Scott and Lawrence Branigan (Appellants) from a judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of Joseph and Edna McKeon (Appellees). 2 Appellants raise numerous challenges to various trial court rulings and claim they are entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, a new trial. After careful review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The relevant facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows. In 1996, Appellant Karen Eichman was renting a home owned by the McKeons situate at 5 Woodmont Trail, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. Appellant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Fanning v. DavneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Estate of WhitleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Brandon v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API