Legal Opinion

Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1995PublishedCited by 287 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*284CAVANAUGH, Judge.

This is an appeal by Johnston the Florist, Inc. from the October 20, 1993 order denying its motion for post-trial relief. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The facts were ably summarized by the trial court as follows:

On December 17, 1986 [Appellee TEDCO Construction Corporation] entered into a contract to build a personal care facility for [O’Neil Village Personal Care Corporation (O’Neil) ]. This was a project financed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Pursuant to HUD, the approved amount for landscaping totaled $20,000.00. Although TEDCO…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Kimmel v. Somerset County CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Viso v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Reuter v. Citizens & Northern BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by287 opinions

  1. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. BorreroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API