Legal Opinion

Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 1995PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

The issue is whether a trial court may dismiss a plaintiffs amended complaint against a party defendant joined after the commencement of the action without leave of court in violation of Pa.R.Civ.P. 1033, even when the improper joinder works no prejudice against the improperly joined defendant or the other parties to the action. We hold that the court may penalize the violation by dismissing the complaint.

Appellee John C. Paden, a construction worker, was injured on the job when he fell through a hole in the second floor of a construction site on May 1,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Garrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Echon v. Pennsylyania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Hoare v. BELL TELEPHONE CO. OF PENN.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API