Shean v. Cook
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro and A. E. Roth for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff to recover from Carrie M. Cook upon her stockholder’s liability for indebtedness incurred by the Morton L. Cook Company, a corporation, in which it was alleged she owned 49,095 shares of the total capital stock of fifty thousand shares. Morton L. Cook, her husband and guardian, was joined as defendant. The court found' that Carrie M. Cook was not a stockholder in the corporation and rendered judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Mrs. Cook has since died and the administratrix of her estate with the will annexed has been substituted. The main…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Western Pac. Ry. Co. v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Moore v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- O'Connor v. WitherbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People's Home Sav. Bank v. StadtmullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sherman v. S. K. D. Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- First National Bank v. De MoulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Peppers v. Pennsylvania Door & Sash Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.