Legal Opinion

People's Home Sav. Bank v. Stadtmuller

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1906No. S.F. No. 3453PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment given after demurrer sustained to the fourth amended complaint of plaintiff. The complaint charged that one F.D. Stadtmuller subscribed for and received from plaintiff one hundred shares of its capital stock, of the par value of one hundred dollars each, and that he continued to be the owner of this stock until the defendant in turn became the owner thereof; that Stadtmuller had paid in thirty-three and one-third dollars per share upon his stock, and was liable to the plaintiff for the sum of sixty-six and two-thirds dollars on each share whenever such unpaid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People ex rel. Probert v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Visalia & Tulare Railroad v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Perkins v. CowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wood v. HamaguchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Geary St., Park & Ocean R.R. v. Bradbury Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Flagg v. SloaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API