Legal Opinion

Schlitz v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1923No. Civ. No. 2571PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The complaint alleges that at all times therein mentioned the defendants were stockholders of the Delano Creamery Company, a corporation; that on November 28, 1914, the corporation executed its promissory note to the First National Bank of Bakersfield for $8,000, due one day after date; that at the isame time the plaintiffs duly indorsed such note and guaranteed the payment thereof and any renewal of the same; that on the twenty-first day of July, 1916, the bank commenced an action against plaintiffs and others to enforce payment of the note and, on the thirteenth day of February, 1918, it…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Merchants Nat. Bk. v. Continental Nat. Bk.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Towers v. Moore (In Re Disanto & Moore Associates, Inc.)District Court, N.D. California · 1984
  4. Anderson v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API