Legal Opinion
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Bender
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-2049PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.
This is an action by Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound” or “GLI”), against Morton A. Bender (“Bender” or “MAB”), individually and doing business as Michael Murray Associates, Michael Murray, doing business as Michael Murray Associates, and Julian Scheer, doing business as Michael Murray Associates, for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation. Greyhound seeks compensatory damages for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation, restitution, and punitive damages for fraudulent misrepresentation. Defendants have asserted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Order of Ahepa v. Travel Consultants, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Virtual Defense & Development International, Inc. v. Republic of MoldovaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- The CUNEO LAW GROUP, PC v. JosephDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- America v. PrestonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- America v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Kriesch v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.