Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hirshler v. Frazier

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1980No. 80-1086PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary issue presented for our consideration is whether relators complied with R. C. 731.32, which provides:

“Whoever seeks to propose an ordinance or measure in a municipal corporation by initiative petition or files a referendum petition against any ordinance or measure shall, before circulating such petition, file a verified copy of the proposed ordinance or measure with the city auditor or the village clerk.” (Emphasis added.)

“ ‘Verified’ means supported by an affidavit as to the truth of the matters set forth; sworn to.” State, ex rel. Clink, v. Smith (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 1, 2. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Billington v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Middletown v. City Commission of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State ex rel. Clink v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Vanderwerf v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API