Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Hirshler v. Frazier
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1980No. 80-1086PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The primary issue presented for our consideration is whether relators complied with R. C. 731.32, which provides:
“Whoever seeks to propose an ordinance or measure in a municipal corporation by initiative petition or files a referendum petition against any ordinance or measure shall, before circulating such petition, file a verified copy of the proposed ordinance or measure with the city auditor or the village clerk.” (Emphasis added.)
“ ‘Verified’ means supported by an affidavit as to the truth of the matters set forth; sworn to.” State, ex rel. Clink, v. Smith (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 1, 2. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Billington v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State Ex Rel. City of Middletown v. City Commission of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- State ex rel. Clink v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Vanderwerf v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.