State Ex Rel. City of Middletown v. City Commission of Middletown
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
It has heretofore been determined by this court that ordinance 2237 enacted by the city • commission of Middletown was valid, but subject to referendum in accordance with Section 5, Article XVIII of the Constitution. City of Middletown v. City Commission of Middletown, 138 Ohio St., 596, 37 N. E. (2d), 609. That case had been instituted in the Court of Common Pleas of Butler county December 2, 1938. It reached this court from the Court of Appeals by a motion to certify May 18,' 1940, and, the case having been admitted, decision thereof by this court was announced November 12, 1941.
The instant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Middletown v. City CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Masters v. BeamerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Wapakoneta v. HelplingOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Tietje v. CollettOhio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sharpe v. HittOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- State ex rel. Brown v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Snyder v. Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Hirshler v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.