Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Clink v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1968No. 68-516PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition alleges, and respondent by his demurrer thereto admits, that relator filed a complete *2and true text of the resolution with the county auditor. However, such resolution was not verified as required by Section 305.33, Revised Code, relating to referendums on resolutions passed by the county commissioners. This section reads as follows:

“Whoever files a referendum petition against any resolution shall, before circulating such petition, file a verified copy of the resoluton with the county auditor.”

In State, ex rel. Mika, v. Lemon, 170 Ohio St. 1, a case involving a similar provision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Courtenay Farmers Co-Operative Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Shaw v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Hirshler v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CastOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State ex rel. Long v. BettmanOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Powell v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API