Legal Opinion

Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2009No. 2008-0315PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal requires us to consider the relationship of the several provisions of R.C. Chapter 4112 applicable to a statutory claim for age discrimination brought by an employee claiming that he was wrongfully discharged from employment. The primary issue is whether defendant-appellant, United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on a claim of age discrimination brought by plaintiff-appellee, Robert Meyer. In particular, we must determine whether Meyer’s age-discrimination claim under R.C. 4112.99 is foreclosed by R.C. 4112.14(C), which provides that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Carol Smith v. Perkins Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Dohme v. Eurand America, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. LloydOhio Supreme Court · 2022

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API