Legal Opinion

Collins v. Rizkana

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 94-136PublishedCited by 260 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The issue before the court is whether Ohio should recognize a common-law tort claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy based upon alleged sexual harassment/discrimination.

As a threshold matter, we must construe the evidence most strongly in favor of Collins. Civ.R. 56(C). In so doing, we must conclude that a genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether Dr. Rizkana subjected Collins to a series of unwanted and offensive sexual contacts and retaliated against her for refusing to disclaim the occurrences, resulting in her constructive discharge.

The traditional rule in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by260 opinions

  1. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Genaro. v. Central Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000

255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API