United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
We are called upon in this case to determine which state statute of limitations period should be borrowed and applied to an employee's action against his employer under § 301 (a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 156, 29 U. S. C. § 185 (a), and Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 424 U. S. 554 (1976).
I
Petitioner United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), employed respondent Mitchell (respondent), as a car washer at its facility on Staten Island, N. Y. On January 13, 1977, respondent was discharged for dishonest acts, including falsifying his timecards and claiming payment for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by864 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
859 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.