Painter v. Graley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtA. William Sweeney, J.
The court of appeals held that appellant did not suffer a violation of her rights under the Ohio Constitution, and was not entitled to relief under the doctrine of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy as established in Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 228, 551 N.E.2d 981. We agree with the majority opinion of the court of appeals, per Presiding Judge (now Justice) F.E. Sweeney, that Painter did not suffer a violation of rights guaranteed by the Ohio Constitution, and we affirm its holding that defendant-appellee Graley was entitled to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Richard M. Yuhasz v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Philip R. Plant v. Morton International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.