Eysoldt v. ProScan Imaging
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Dinkelacker, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant and cross-appellee, Go Daddy.com, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered upon jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs-appellees and cross-appellants, Jeff Eysoldt, Mark Eysoldt, and Jill Eysoldt. The Eysoldts appeal that part of the trial court’s judgment granting Go Daddy’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of punitive damages. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
I. Facts and Procedure
{¶ 2} The record shows that in November 2002, Jeff Eysoldt opened account number 1165490 with Go Daddy and transferred his domain name, Eysoldt.com,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Sensenbrenner v. Rust, Orling & Neale, Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- O'Brien v. AngleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Lazette v. KulmatyckiDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Daniels v. Northcoast Anesthesia Providers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- MedChoice Financial, LLC v. ADS Alliance Data Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Pierce v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.