Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
As an optionee, petitioner has no standing to appeal from the order of the Superior Court. Appellate review of the order of a municipal board of adjustment is available only to the owner of the property affected by the ruling, and this right does not extend to a mere optionee. Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107, 37 S.E. 2d 128 (1946). The holding of the Supreme Court in Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974), does not preclude the application of this rule in the case sub judice. In Refining Co., supra, the petitioner had conditionally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stephenson v. Town of GarnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Pigford v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF CITY OF KINSTONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980