Legal Opinion
Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 25, 1942PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On 12 June, 1941, plaintiffs filed with the Secretary of State of North Carolina a proposed certificate of incorporation of an Industrial Bank. The proposed certificate in all respects complied with the requirements of law. The prescribed organization tax and recording fees were paid. The Secretary of State referred the application to the Commissioner of Banks pursuant to the provisions of the statute. (Michie's, sections 217 [b] and 225 [m]). The Commissioner of Banks, after giving notice to the plaintiffs and other interested parties, held a public meeting in Greensboro at which he heard…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.