Legal Opinion

Yolo Water & Power Co. v. Hudson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1920No. S. F. No. 9087PublishedCited by 48 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Appellant is a corporation engaged in selling water for purposes of irrigation. It obtains the water which it sells from Clear Lake, in Lake County. Appellant proposed to increase its supply of water by raising the surface of the lake by means of a dam to a height of ten feet above the mean low-water mark. In accomplishing this purpose the various tracts of land adjoining the lake would be flooded to the ten-foot level. This action was accordingly brought for the purpose of condemning and taking in fpe the lands below the proposed ten-foot level, these lands being portions of larger tracts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Santa Ana v. HarlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Colusa & Hamilton Railroad v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API