Legal Opinion

City of Santa Ana v. Harlin

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1893No. 19030PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

The action was brought by the city of Santa Ana, a municipal corporation, to condemn a right of way over certain laud of the defendant for the opening of Second Street in said city. The cause was tried by a jury and the damages assessed at two hundred and sixty-seven dollars, for which sum judgment was entered in favor of defendant, as well as a decree that the use of the land for the purposes of a street was a public use and the taking thereof necessary to such use. The appeal is from this judgment and from an .order denying a motion for a new trial. The final order of condemnation…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API