Legal Opinion

Bland v. Peters

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1911No. 1360PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Custer County Court; A. H. Latimer, Judge. Action by Elizabeth Peters against James Bland. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

On September 10, 1908, Elizabeth Peters, defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action in the county court of Custer county against James Bland, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant.

Her petition alleges, in substance, that on July 30, 1908, acting through her husband and agent, George Peters, she purchased from defendant a cow, which was warranted to be a good milch cow, and was sold with the privilege of being returned, if unsatisfactory in said respect; that at the time of said sale it was further agreed that if the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Armstrong, Byrd & Co. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Murphy v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Osborne v. FrancisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. YountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Lawless v. RaddisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Sands v. David Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. AkardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API