Legal Opinion

Sands v. David Bradley & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1913No. 2492PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Osage County; John J. Shea, Judge. Action by David Bradley & Co. against A. S. Sands to recover a money judgment. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This was an action to recover from defendant the sum of $500, together with interest thereon at 6 per cent, from August 31, 1901. Plaintiff, in its petition, charged that defendant, in 1901, was a practicing attorney at Wilber, Saline county, Neb.; that in 1894 it obtained a judgment in the district court of said county against Wilder & Nelson in the sum of $1,252.16; that said judgment was placed in the hands of defendant for collection; that he collected thereon the sum of $500 on August 31, 1901, and failed to remit the same, but, on the contrary, converted it to his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Darlington's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  2. Prescott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Armstrong, Byrd & Co. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Allen v. KenyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Caddo Nat. Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. VolpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Swift v. McMurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Jones v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Hafer v. LemonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API