Legal Opinion

St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Akard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 5998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from County Court, Pushmataha County: L. P. Davenport, Judge. Action by A. H. Akard against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS. C.

Reference will be made to the parties herein as they appeared in the court below. The amended petition of ifiaintiff is as follows, omitting caption and mere formal parts:

“Comes now the plaintiff and for cause of action against the defendant states:
“1. That defendant is a railroad corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, and owns and operates a line of railroad, and which runs into and through Antlers and Pushmataha county.
“2. That on or about the 4th day of April, 1932, at Ft. Worth, Texas, plaintiff herein delivered to the St. Louis, San Francisco •&…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newton v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Craig Wall v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Haskell v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Paulsen v. HouriganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API