Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1923No. 11269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

Plaintiff in error assigns five grounds of error, but all are presented under two propositions in the briefs and arguments. These propositions are:

“First: That the court erred in admitting evidence on the part of Crenshaw over the objections and exceptions of the plaintiff gas company.
“Second: That the court erred in refusing certain instructions requested, by the gas company, and in giving certain instructions to the jury over the objections and exceptions of the gas company.”

The action of the court complained of, and presented under the first proposition, is the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Spurrier Lumber Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Smith v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ayres v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Star v. StarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Dill v. ManerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API