Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Crenshaw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 19, 1923No. 11269PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
Plaintiff in error assigns five grounds of error, but all are presented under two propositions in the briefs and arguments. These propositions are:
“First: That the court erred in admitting evidence on the part of Crenshaw over the objections and exceptions of the plaintiff gas company.
“Second: That the court erred in refusing certain instructions requested, by the gas company, and in giving certain instructions to the jury over the objections and exceptions of the gas company.”
The action of the court complained of, and presented under the first proposition, is the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Spurrier Lumber Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Smith v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ayres v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Star v. StarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Dill v. ManerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955