Armstrong, Byrd & Co. v. Crump
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Seminole County Court; T. S. Cobb. Judge. Action by Armstrong, Byrd & Co. against George C. Crump. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. On harmless error in admission of evidence of verbal warranty: Tufts v. Verhuyl 124 Mich 242; Little v. Van Syckle, 115 Mich. 480.
1Opinion of the CourtDuNN, J.
This case presents error from the county court of Seminole county. Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the court below, brought its action against George C. Crump to recover on certain promissory notes, given by him for a piano sold by the plaintiff The defendant answered, setting up that the piano was sold upon an oral warranty that the same would be in all respects identical with an instrument sold to one H. E. Rogers, and that defendant, relying lipón his warranty, had purchased the piano. That the instrument was not as warranted, but so constructed as to be totally unsuited, unfit, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Blackmore v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Matzenbaugh v. People ex rel. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Alpha Checkrower Co. v. David Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Kuhl v. Supreme Lodge Select Knights & LadiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stolfa v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Enid City Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Shawnee Nat. Bank v. PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.