Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Polich

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1967No. Civ. No. 8248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs Reginald and Gladys Saunders and Florence Roos in trespass and to quiet title to a strip of land 331.89 feet in length and varying in width from 20 feet at the west to 14.6 feet at the east. The Saunders own the parcel south of and claim the disputed strip. Florence Roos, a prior owner of the land owned by Saunders, is owner of a purchase money trust deed which by its legal description encumbers the disputed parcel and additional real property. Defendants, brothers Sam and Joe Polich, own the parcel to the north of and claim the disputed strip. Judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Harrington v. BoehmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. County of Yolo v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Kimball v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Stearns v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API