Legal Opinion
Kimball v. McKee
California Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1906No. S.F. No. 3421PublishedCited by 15 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action of trespass in which the defendant is charged with having stripped the bark from a large number of trees growing on plaintiff's land, described as lots 1, 3, and 4, in section 31, township 5 south, range 2 east, Humboldt meridian, and the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 30 of the same township. The shaded portion of the accompanying map shows the position of these lots in their relation to each other as well as in relation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miller v. GrunskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.