Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Boehmer

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1901No. Sac. No. 863PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action was brought to recover possession of a tract of land alleged to be situated in Colusa County, and described as lot 3 of section 24, in township 17 north, range 2 west, Mount Diablo meridian, and containing 54 acres, according to the United States plat thereof. The defendants had judgment, and plaintiff appeals from said judgment and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff claims title to the premises in dispute, as swamp and overflowed land, under a patent from the state of California, dated June 20, 1899. The defendants claim that the land, of which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whiting v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. County of Yolo v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Phelps v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Swarzwald v. CooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Galbraith v. ParkerArizona Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API