Legal Opinion
Ruzanoff v. Retailers Credit Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1929No. Docket No. 3615PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The plaintiffs brought this action for the recovery of personal property.and fixtures or their value, if delivery could not be had, and damages for the detention thereof. After the case was tried and submitted, the court, on motion of counsel for the plaintiffs, ordered that the prayer of the complaint be amended by striking therefrom the demand for the recovery of the property or its value in case delivery could not be had.
The court found in substance: That at the times mentioned in the complaint the plaintiffs were entitled to the possession of such property, consisting of “1 ice box, 1…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northwestern Title Security Co. v. FlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Overgaard v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Pepitone v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- McFaddin v. H. S. Crocker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Barry v. State Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.