Pepitone v. Russo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Plaintiff Grace Pepitone appeals from the trial court’s judgment reducing the amount of damages and failing to award prejudgment interest in an action brought for fraud and breach of fiduciaiy duty. The facts briefly stated are as follows:
In May 1968, appellant exchanged a piece of real property for a motel owned by one Goldy. The exchange agreement was drafted and the deal was transacted by respondents, a real estate brokerage firm and its individual members (hereinafter “respondents”). Due to the fact that respondents failed to disclose that a second deed of trust encumbering…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Northwestern Title Security Co. v. FlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Redke v. SilvertrustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Salahutdin v. Valley of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.