Legal Opinion
McFaddin v. H. S. Crocker Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1963No. Civ. 26509PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the defendants had successfully objected to the introduction of any evidence by the plaintiff on the ground that each alleged cause- of action embodied in the complaint failed to state ..facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
In ’the first cause of action it was alleged that on or about February 1, 1955, the defendant H. S. Crocker Co., Inc., and its agent, Duncan McIntosh, commenced an action in the superior court against Mrs. McFaddin, the plaintiff in the present action, and caused to be issued “a Writ of Claim and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Eichman v. Fotomat Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.