Delois v. Barrett Block Partners
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2006, a dispute arose between plaintiff John Delois, then a tenant of defendants’ in a “live/work” space on Harrison Street in San Francisco, and defendants. The dispute, described in more detail below, was purportedly resolved by a written agreement between the parties. But various and sundry factors led to alleged breaches of that agreement; in any event, plaintiff did not vacate the premises on the date agreed upon in the settlement agreement and, as a result, defendants did not forgive the past due rent or return the security deposit as they would have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Summit Bank v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Moriarty v. Laramar Management CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Applied Biosystems v. 384 Foster City Blvd. PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ben-Shahar v. PickartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.