Legal Opinion

Delois v. Barrett Block Partners

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 2009No. A121665PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2006, a dispute arose between plaintiff John Delois, then a tenant of defendants’ in a “live/work” space on Harrison Street in San Francisco, and defendants. The dispute, described in more detail below, was purportedly resolved by a written agreement between the parties. But various and sundry factors led to alleged breaches of that agreement; in any event, plaintiff did not vacate the premises on the date agreed upon in the settlement agreement and, as a result, defendants did not forgive the past due rent or return the security deposit as they would have…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Summit Bank v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Moriarty v. Laramar Management CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Applied Biosystems v. 384 Foster City Blvd. PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Ben-Shahar v. PickartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API